Creative capital of Siberian cities

Authors

  • Nadezhda Vavilina Novosibirsk State University of Architecture, Design and Arts named after A. D. Kryachkov
  • Galina Parshukova Novosibirsk State University of Architecture, Design and Arts named after A. D. Kryachkov
  • Polina Parshukova Saint Petersburg State University of Industrial Technologies and Design

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.69.1846

Keywords:

social capital, creative capital, sources of creativity, creative consumption, creative city

Abstract

The article considers sociological theoretical approaches to the understanding of creative capital as a resource for the development of urban economies. It features methodological approaches to sociological research. The data of comparative analysis of the creative capital of Krasnoyarsk and Novosibirsk are presented. The comparative analysis was carried out on the materials of real sociological research conducted in 2020 according to a common methodology for determining a quota sample. The study was carried out on the basis of a quota sample of the city population aged 18 and over. The reliability of the data obtained was ± 3,5 %. The authors make a conclusion that there are differences in the nature of creative capital in Krasnoyarsk and Novosibirsk. This fact should condition different strategies for the development of creative industries for these cities.

How to Cite

Vavilina, N., Parshukova, G., & Parshukova, P. (2021). Creative capital of Siberian cities. Project Baikal, 18(69), 50–53. https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.69.1846

Published

2021-11-13

Issue

No. 69 (2021): glocal

Section

refereed articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital. New York: Columbia University Press.

Ekspertnoe issledovanie “Rossiiskie regionalnye stolitsy: razvitie, osnovannoe na culture” [An expert study “Russian regional capitals: culture based development”] (2018). The Moscow School of Social and Economic Sciences, Vladimir Potanin Foundation. Moscow.

Erokhin, G., & Parshukova, G. (2020). Residents’ satisfaction with the city space. Project Baikal, 17(64), 114-117. https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.64.1646

Gashenko, A. E. (2019). Teoriya patternov v formirovanii gorodskoi sredy [Pattern theory in urban environment formation]. Praxema. Journal of visual semiotics, 3 (21), 75–88.

Indeks kachestva zhizni v gorodakh Rossii [Quality of life index in the cities of Russia] (n.d.). PwC global network. Retrieved June 16, 2021, from https://www.pwc.ru/ru/publications/creative-capital-index.html

Landry, Ch. (2006). Kreativnyi gorod [The creative city]. Moscow: Kalssika-ХХI.

Moroz, V. V. (2016). Obzor zarubezhnykh teorii kreativnosti [Foreign theories of creativity review]. Vestnik OGU, 12(200). Retrieved June 16, from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obzor-zarubezhnyh-teoriy-kreativnosti

Putnam, R. (1996). Chtoby demokratiya srabotala: grazhdanskie traditsii v sovremennoi Italii [Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy]. Moscow: Ad Marginem.

Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Shultz, T. (1968). Human capital in the International Encyclopedia of the social sciences (Vol. 6). New York.

Vavilina, N. D. (2020). Solidaritization as a social phenomenon and social process: regional context. Regional Research of Russia, 10(3), 431–442.