Borisoglebsk. Identity of a small town

Authors

  • Petr Kapustin Voronezh State Technical University
  • Denis Astashov Voronezh State Technical University

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.65.1674

Keywords:

small town, historic town, Borisoglebsk, integrity of the environment, identity of the habitat, tools of urban development

Abstract

Borisoglebsk is a district center in the Voronezh region, a typical provincial town in the Black Earth region of Russia. Despite its turbulent history, the town managed to save most of its historical and cultural wealth. Today this small town is “frozen” in anticipation of upcoming changes. The changes are coming together with large-scale national projects, building initiatives and the general tendency towards improvements and contemporary design. The authors discuss the measure of adequacy of possible development strategies for the values of the urban fabric woven by a long and slow accumulation of qualities “in situ”.

How to Cite

Kapustin, P., & Astashov, D. (2021). Borisoglebsk. Identity of a small town. Project Baikal, 17(65), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.65.1674

Published

2021-01-05

Issue

No. 65 (2020): province

Section

refereed articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Astashov, D. Yu. (2015). Gradostroitelnyi geneticheskii kod kak “yadro” evolyutsionnogo razvitiya arkhitekturno-planirovochnoi struktury g. Borisoglebska [Town-planning genetic code as a “core” of the evolutionary development of architectural and planning pattern of Borisoglebsk]. Molodoi uchenyi, 13, 773-780.

Bokov, A. V. (2019, April 8). Sreda: vchera, segodnya, zavtra [Environment: yesterday, today, tomorrow]. Retrieved May 20, 2020, from https://ardexpert.ru/article/15414?fbclid=IwAR37YADR6w4lDcBKl_pZeZb-bxQs-ХRTcVi2fV1ZZblgaqwmVOV1laBJYUf8

Glazychev, V. L. (2001, July 12). Evolyutsiya proektirovaniya [Design evolution]. Lecture 1. Retrieved May 20, 2020, from http://www.shkp.ru/lib/archive/second/2001-1/8

Heide H. and Wijnbelt D. (1996, February). To Know and to Make: The Link between Research and Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design, 1(1), 75 – 90.

Kapustin, P. V. (2018). Conversion of design. Project Baikal, 15(55), 142–147. https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.55.1306

Lynch, K. (1982). Obraz goroda [The image of the city] (V. L. Glazychev, Trans.). Moscow: Sroiizdat.

Murunov, S. (n.d.). Metodologiya (10+2 bazovykh lektsii pro postsovetskii gorod i soobshchestva. Avtorskie modeli, tekhnologii, opredeleniya) [Methodology (10+2 basic lectures on a post-soviet city and communities. Author’s models, technologies, definitions)]. Retrieved May, 20, from http://workshopuniversity.ru/methodology?fbclid=IwAR2qh5n8qxFiX0dllPPjnIhdQUbvdQusBLzC9rpfZ0rMQQOZz04Nk28KcLA

Nevler, L. (1987). Kultura khamstva [The culture of rudeness]. Dekorativnoe iskusstvo SSSR, 9, 23-26. Retrieved May 20, 2020, from http://www.cornelius.ru/GB/viewsm.php?id=218960

Rowe, C., & Koetter, F. (2018). Gorod-kollazh [Collage city] (I. Tretyakov, Trans.). Strelka Press.

Sharygin, A. (2020, April 27). Urbanistika: professiya ili politika? [Urbanistics: profession or policy?]. Retrieved May, 20, 2020, from https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10217813586475727&set=gm.2638928343010296&type=3&theate

Tkacheva, M. (2019). Small and historic towns. Project Baikal, 16(61), 34–41. http://www.projectbaikal.com/index.php/pb/article/view/1498