Urban cybernotopics: Topographical complexity

Authors

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51461/issn.2309-3072/80.2344

Keywords:

theory, cybernotopics, nonlinearity, topology, place development, complexity

Abstract

Based on the conquest of the forces of nature, Western European civilisation is technogenic. But extensive development of the planet becomes exhausted, and a new view of the interaction between nature and society is needed. The original cosmism of ancient thought and the works of outstanding Russian scientific cosmists can be the basis of urban cybernotopics – a new scientific direction that creates an image of the future based on the study of the mechanisms of multidimensional ‘embeddedness’ of the activity of human society in socio-economic and landscape systems. The article considers cybernotopics in the perspective of topographical complexity on the example of rural territory.

How to Cite

Gaevskaya, Z. (2024). Urban cybernotopics: Topographical complexity. Project Baikal, 21(80), 128–134. https://doi.org/10.51461/issn.2309-3072/80.2344

Published

2024-08-09

Issue

No. 80 (2024): image of the future

Section

refereed articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Afonso Nadir. (n.d.). Contemporary-artists.ru. Retrieved March 24, 2024, from http://contemporary-artists.ru/Nadir_Afonso.html

Armand, A. D. (1988). Samoorganizatsiya i samoregulirovanie geograficheskikh sistem [Self-organisation and self-regulation of geographical systems]. Moscow: Nauka.

Duplinskaya, Y. M. (2013). The analogue and digital as the types of constitution and destruction of being. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 13(2), 21-26.

Gaevskaya, Z. (2023). Urban cybernotopics. Project Baikal, 19(74), 96-102. https://doi.org/10.51461/pb.74.17

Kagansky, V. L. (2016). Landscape. Russia. Post-modernity. Labyrinth, 1/2, 74-85.

Kiryushin, V. I. (2011). Teoriya adaptivno-landshaftnogo zemledeliya i proektirovanie agrolandshaftov [Theory of adaptive-landscape farming and design of agrolandscapes]. Moscow: KolosS.

Kolbovsky, E. Yu. (1999). Landshaft i natsionalnyi peizazh: opyt kulturologichaskogo issledovaniya [Landscape and national scenery: the experience of culturological research]. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 3.

Kolodin, K. I. (2004). Formoobrazovanie obyektov zagorodnoi sredy [Formation of objects of the suburban environment]. Moscow: Architecture.

Kuznetsov, O. L., & Bolshakov, B. E. (2013). Russian cosmism, global crisis, sustainable development. Sustainable innovative development: design and management, 9(1(18)). Retrieved March 24, 2024, from http://www.rypravlenie.ru/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/1-KyznetcovBolshakov.pdf

Nikolaev, V. A. ( 2005). Landshaftovedenie: Estetika i dizain [Landscape science: Aesthetics and design]. Moscow: Aspect Press. Sériot, P. (2017). Rol biologicheskikh i geograficheskikh modelei v strukturalizme russkikh prazhan [The Role of Biological and Geographical Models in the Structuralism of Russian Praguers]. In Roman Osipovich Yakobson (N. Avtonomova, Trans.). Retrieved March 24, 2024, from https://crecleco.seriot.ch/recherche/biblio/17Jak.pdf

Tom, R. (2002). Strukturnaya stabilnost i morfogenez [Structural stability and morphogenesis]. Moscow: Logos.

Vedenin, Y. A., & Kuleshova, M. E. (Eds.). (2004). Kulturnyi landshaft kak obyekt naslediya [Cultural Landscape as a Heritage Object]. Moscow: Institute of Heritage; St. Petersburg: Dmitry Bulanin.

Zhuchenko, A. A. (2009). Obespechenie prodovolstvennoi bezopasnosti Rossii v XXI veke na osnove adaptivnoi strategii ustoichivogo razvitiya.[Ensuring food security of Russia in the XXI century on the basis of adaptive strategy for sustainable development of agro-industrial complex (theory and practice). Kirov: NIISKh Severo-Vostoka.