Aesthetics of urban extremes: iterating culture

Authors

  • Liya Mirkushina Moscow City University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51461/issn.2309-3072/80.2340

Keywords:

extremeness, urban discourse, aesthetics, metamodernism, postmodernism, imitation

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to study the phenomenon of extreme urban discourse and, on this basis, to trace the influence of the phenomenon on the aesthetics of the city. The author comes to the conclusion about the complex and contradictory nature of the extreme state of being. The conclusion is due to the situation of stimulating city designers to innovative solutions, as well as the dichotomous influence of extremeness on the dynamics of the city. The aesthetic dimension of crisis states reveals shocking architectural solutions and directions of the early 20th century. However, in the 21st century, the focus shifts to simulation games, which represents a metamodern ‘return’ to a new sincerity. The author conceptualizes this trend as iterating culture.

How to Cite

Mirkushina , L. (2024). Aesthetics of urban extremes: iterating culture. Project Baikal, 21(80), 108–113. https://doi.org/10.51461/issn.2309-3072/80.2340

Published

2024-08-09

Issue

Section

refereed articles

References

Akker, R. (2022). Metamodernizm. Istorichnost, affekt i glubina posle postmodernizma [Мetamodernism: Historicity, affect, and depth after postmodernism] (V. M. Lipki, Trans.). Мoscow: RIPOL klassik.

Harvey, D. (2021). Sostoyanie postmoderna: Issledovanie istokov kulturnyh izmenenij [The Condition of Postmodernity. An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change] (N. Procenko, Trans.). Мoscow: Publishing house of the Higher School of Economics.

Kagan, M. S. (1983). Estetika. [Aesthetics]. Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary. Мoscow: Soviet encyclopedia.

Lakaev, P. V. (2022). Fenomenologiya ‘bedstvij’ v tvorchestve Pitirima Sorokina [Phenomenology of ‘disasters’ in the works of Pitirim Sorokin]. Abyss (Issues of philosophy, political science and social anthropology), 2(20), 26-36.

Losev, A. F. (1995). Dialektika hudozhestvennoj formy [Dialectics of artistic form] Form – Style – Expression. Мoscow: Mysl.

Sartre, J. P. (2014). Toshnota [Nausea] (Yu.Ya. Yahnina, Trans.). Moscow: Ast.

Savchenko, I. A. (2023). Vektor Shtera: znanie v koordinatah goroda [Shter vector: knowledge in city coordinates]. Epistemology and philosophy of science, 60(4), 173-189.

Sorokin, P. A. (1992). Chelovek. Civilizaciya. Obshchestvo [Man. Civilization. Society] (S. A. Sidorenko, Trans.) Мoscow: Politizdat.

Tafuri, M. (1979). Architecture and Utopia. Design and Capitalist Development. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Trubina, N. A. (2023). Homo urbanus v modalnom diskurse bytiya: problema chasti i celogo [Homo urbanus in the modal discourse of being: The problem of part and whole]. Digital Scientist: Philosopher’s Laboratory, 6(3), 105-117.

Volichenko, O. (2023). Arhitektura kak otvet na vyzovy sovremennosti [Architecture as a response to the challenges of modernity]. Project Baikal, 20(78), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.51461/issn.2309-3072/78.2228

Zavyalova, N. V. (2013). Sushchnostnye harakteristiki ekstremalnosti [Essential characteristics of extremeness]. Historical and socioeducational thought, 6(22), 114-120.

Zukin, Sh. (2015). Kultury gorodov [The Cultures of Cities]. Moscow: New Literary Review.