Contradictions in the development of architecture science

Authors

  • Marina Dymchenko Донской государственный технический университет
  • Svetlana Kurilova Don State Technical University

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51461/issn.2309-3072/78.2233

Keywords:

architectural form, dialogue, ontological basis of architecture, self-awareness, modernism, science of architecture, language of architecture

Abstract

The aim of the research is to study the formation of the ontological foundations of the science of architecture as an experience of its self-consciousness in the context of the evolution of spatial codes of cultural experience. The article considers contradictions of the modernist definition of architectural form, as well as the formation of the scientific discourse of architecture and the identity of architects’ professional thinking in general. The main hypothesis is based on the thesis that the freely historically unfolding evolution of architectural form is an objective experience of consolidating the self-consciousness of architecture as a text of its immanent expression and self-reference. The authors specify the limitations of the scientific functionalist discourse, which do not allow forming the internal basis for an autoreferential image of the architectural reality. Problematization of the ontological foundations of the science of architecture is a necessary link in the evolution of the methodology of architectural thinking and form making in post-industrial society.

How to Cite

Dymchenko, M., & Kurilova, S. (2023). Contradictions in the development of architecture science. Project Baikal, 20(78), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.51461/issn.2309-3072/78.2233

Published

2023-12-17

Issue

No. 78 (2023): theories and practice

Section

refereed articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Bachelard, G. (2004). Izbrannoe: Poetika prostranstva [Selected works: The poetics of space]. Moscow: Russian political encyclopedia.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1975). Problema soderzhaniya, materiala i formy v slovesnom khudozhestvennom tvorchestve [The problem of content, material and form in verbal artistic creativity]. In Questions of literature and aesthetics. Works of different years (pp. 6-71). Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya Literatura.

Dobritsyna, I. A. (2004). Ot postmodernizma k nelineinoi arkhitekture: Arkhitektura v kontekste sovremennoi filosofii i nauki [From postmodernism to nonlinear architecture: Architecture in the context of modern philosophy and science]. Moscow: Progress-tradition.

Eco, U. (2004). Otsutstvuyushchaya struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiyu [The absent structure. Introduction to semiology]. SPb: Symposium.

Gabrichevsky, A. G. (2002). Morfologiya iskusstva [Morphology of art]. Moscow: Agraf.

Gropius, W. (1972). Industriya zhilishcha [Housing industry]. In Masters of architecture about architecture (p. 343). Moscow: Iskusstvo.

Ikonnikov, A.V. (2006). Prostranstvo i forma v arkhitekture i gradostroitelstve [Space and form in architecture and urban planning]. Moscow: KomKniga.

Jencks, C. (1985). Yazyk arkhitektury postmoderna [The Language of Post-Modern Architecture]. Moscow: Stroyizdat.

Kimball, F. (1943). The Creation of the Rococo. Philadelphia: Philadelphia museum of art; Portland: Southworth-Anthoensen Press.

Kiyanenko, K. V. (2017). Architectural education as a subject of academic research and reflection. Architecture and construction of Russia, 2(222). Retrieved February 21, 2018, from http://www.asrmag.ru/RUS-2017.pdf

Losev, A. F. (1995). Dialektika khudozhestvennoi formy [The dialectics of art form]. In Form – style – expression (pp. 5-296). Moscow: Mysl.

Mendelson, E. (1972). Problemy novoi arkhitektury [The problems of a new architecture]. In Masters of architecture about architecture (pp. 306-310). Moscow: Iskusstvo.

Norberg-Schulz, Chr. (1980). Genius Loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. New York: Rizzoli.

Ovchinnikova, N. P. (2011). Osnovy naukovedeniya arkhitektury [Fundamentals of architecture studies]. SPb: SPSUACE.

Rossiisky statistichesky ezhegodnik [Russian Statistical Annual Book]. (2017). Мoscow: Rosstat.

Sanoff, H. (2017). The History and Future of Architectural Education. Architecture and construction of Russia, 2(222). Retrieved February 21, 2018, from http://www.asrmag.ru/2-2017/Sanoff_2-2017.pdf

Shangareev, R., & Metlenkov, N. (2015). Paradigm parameters of architecture of postindustrial society. Architecture and construction of Russia, 11-12(215-216). Retrieved February 21, 2018, from http://www.asrmag.ru/ann-rus_1-12_2015.pdf

Shpet, G. G. (2007). Iskusstvo kak vid znaniya. Izbrannye trudy po filosofii kultury [Art as a form of knowledge. Selected works on the philosophy of culture]. Moscow: Russian political encyclopedia.

Sullivan, L. G. (1972). Function and form. In Masters of architecture about architecture (pp. 46-52). Moscow: Iskusstvo.