Residential architecture in the face of changes Authors Asmik Klochko National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering Downloads PDF (Русский) DOI: https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.71.1952 Keywords: vectors of architecture, trends in architecture, living environment, residential architecture, multifunctional residential buildings, bifunctional residential building Abstract The ongoing global socio-economic, cultural and political changes give rise to an urgent need for a prudent modernization of traditional models of living environment design. The article is devoted to the problems of the future of post-industrial and post-pandemic residential architecture. The article analyzes the most significant social, economic, political, cultural, technological and other trends in the modern society, which directly affect the architectural design of the living environment. The author reveals the consolidated trends in residential architecture of the near future. How to Cite Klochko, A. (2022). Residential architecture in the face of changes. Project Baikal, 19(71), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.71.1952 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Published 2022-03-07 Issue No. 71 (2022): changes Section refereed articles License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. References Lemeshko, E. M., Luneva, O. S., & Bespalova, O. A. (2019). Budushchee sovremennoj sem’i kak social’nogo instituta [The future of the modern family as a social institution]. European Forum of Young Researchers: Collection of articles (pp. 245–249). Metlenkov, N. F. (2019). Budushchee arhitektury [The future of architecture]. Architecture and construction of Russia, 1(229), 2–3. Moiseev, Yu. M. (2019). Urbanisticheskie videniya budushchego arhitektury i arhitektura budushchego [Urban visions of the future of architecture and architecture of the future]. Architecture and construction of Russia, 2, 7–8. Nikolaeva, E. I. (2016). Sovremennoe sostoyanie sem’i kak sotsialnogo instituta. Kakih izmenenij stoit zhdat' v budushchem [The current state of the family as a social institution. What changes should be expected in the future]. Bulletin of practical psychology of education, 2(47), 95–102. Rappaport, A. (2021). The city and the center: paradoxes, questions, problems. Project Baikal, 18(67), 42–44. https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.67.1752 Savelieva, L. V. (2020). Prozrachnaya arhitektura dlya prozrachnogo obshchestva [Transparent architecture for a transparent society]. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2(51), 33–42. DOI: 10.24411/1998- 4839-2020-15102. Retrieved from: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2020/2kvart20/PDF/02_savelieva.pdf Savelieva, L. V. (2014). Fenomen “virtual’nosti” v arhitekture [The phenomenon of “virtuality” in architecture]. Science, education and experimental design. Proceedings of the Moscow Architectural Institute: Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 202–204). Shulman, E. M. (n.d.). Politicheskaya futurologiya: budushchee sem’i, chastnoj sobstvennosti i gosudarstva [Political futurology: the future of the family, private property and state]. Pryamaya rech. Retrieved November 21, 2020, from https://www.pryamaya.ru/shulman_politicheskaya_futurologiya Toffler, E., & Toffler, H. (2007). Revolyucionnoe bogatstvo [Revolutionary Wealth]. M.: AST. Vavilova, T. Ya. (2010). Aktual'nost' primeneniya kategorii “tolerantnost’” v arhitekturnoj tipologii ob”ektov social’noj sfery [About an urgency of application of a category “tolerance” in architectural typology of objects of social sphere]. Sociology of the city, 3, 16–22.