Immobility and mobility in architecture

Authors

  • Petr Kapustin Voronezh State Technical University

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.71.1939

Keywords:

stability and dynamics in architecture, architectural traditions and design innovation theory, monumentality, changes in architecture, COVID-19 pandemic and urban planning, progress and development

Abstract

Stability that has been embodied by architecture for centuries now faces the challenges of total dynamism. The tendencies of artification of the world, including those in the previously unthinkable fields, have gained momentum. The author believes that today, architecture is facing the demand to make a new historical choice: to restore itself as a bearer of enduring values of habitat or to dissolve together with the whole civilization in the accelerating stream of uncontrollable changes. This is the main subject of this article.

How to Cite

Kapustin, P. (2022). Immobility and mobility in architecture. Project Baikal, 19(71), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.71.1939

Published

2022-03-07

Issue

No. 71 (2022): changes

Section

refereed articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Bagina, E. (2019). Art Deco: The western hedonism and the Soviet romance. Project Baikal, 16(62), 120-125. https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.62.1559

Bollnow, O. F. (n.d.). Novaya ukrytost. Problema preodoleniya ekzistentsializma. Vvedenie [The new sense of security. The problem of overcoming existentialism. Introduction]. Anthropology. Retrieved January 19, 2022, from http://anthropology.ru/ru/person/bolnov

Feyerabend, P. (2007). Protiv metoda. Ocherk anarkhistskoi teorii poznaniya [Against Method. Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge]. Moscow: AST.

Foucault, M. (2016). Nadzirat i nakazyvat. Rozhdenie tyurmy [Discipline and punish. The birth of prison]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press.

Genisaresky, O. I. (1992). Tvorcheskaya deyatelnost kak problematika dizaina [Creative activity as a design problem]. Voprosy metodologii, 3-4, 10-28. Retrieved January 19, 2022, from https://www.fondgp.ru/old/lib/journals/vm/1992/3-4/v923gen0.html

Kapustin, P. V. (2017). “Antiarkhitektura” – Proektirovanie – Sreda: “Otsutstvuyushchee” i ego otrazheniya [“Anti-Architecture" – Design – Environment: the “absent” and its reflections]. Questions of the Theory of Architecture. Architecture: Modern Experience of Professional Self-Reflection: Collection of scientific papers and reports at the Ninth and Tenth Ikonnikov Readings (I. A. Dobritsyna, Ed.) (pp. 52-57). Moscow: LENAND.

Kapustin, P. (2018). Conversion of design. Project Baikal, 15(55), 142-147. https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.55.1306

Kapustin, P. (2019). Art Deco. Poetics of poison. Project Baikal, 16(62), 138-147. https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.62.1561

Kapustin, P. (2020a). Art Deco: Harsh fruits of a deserted garden. Project Baikal, 17(63), 142-148. https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.63.1610

Kapustin, P. (2020b). Pilaster: From a small detail to great mysteries. Project Baikal, 17(66), 98-104. https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.66.1725

Ragon, M. (1969). Goroda budushchego [Cities of the future]. Moscow: World.

Sloterdijk, P. (2001). Kritika tsinicheskogo razuma [Critique of cynical reason]. Yekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta.

Zavadovsky, P. (2019). Ivan Leonidov and the “Narkomtyazhprom” style. Project Baikal, 16(62), 112-119. https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.62.1544