Urban cybernotopics

Authors

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51461/pb.74.17

Keywords:

alternative, paradigm shift, linearity, nonlinearity, interactions, complex adaptive system, cybernotopics

Abstract

The current linear model of global development is irrational: it is accompanied by clusters of global cyclic crises (economic, environmental, military, political). The western urban planning school cannot offer a way out of the unprecedented crisis of the
industrial civilization because it is built on a linear subject-centered picture of the world, which object of study consists in attributive
characteristics (properties) of individual items. Postindustrial development of our country requires a new paradigm of urban development – cybernotopics, which is built upon a nonlinear world view, using outstanding achievements of the school of Russian
cosmism based on topocentrism, where the object of study includes qualitative properties of space and the whole.

How to Cite

Gaevskaya, Z. (2023). Urban cybernotopics. Project Baikal, 19(74), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.51461/pb.74.17

Published

2023-01-05

Issue

No. 74 (2022): alternatives

Section

refereed articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Armand, A. D. (1988). Samoregulyatsiya i samoregulirovanie geograficheskikh sistem [Self-organization and self-regulation of geographic systems]. Moscow: Nauka.

Baranov, I. P. (n.d.). Using the concept of plastics relief in solving problems of modern city planning and architectural planning. Retrieved

August 29, 2022, from http://intercarto.msu.ru/jour/articles/article129.pdf

Gaevskaya, Z. (2020). The future of non-linear architecture. Project Baikal, 17(66), 132-136. https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.66.1730

Gaevskaya, Z., & Mityagin, S. (2020). Smart city of the 22 century: A closing circle. Project Baikal, 17(65), 12-16. https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.65.1667

Kalutskov, V. N. (2015). Three foundations of geographic onomastics: Toponym – place name – geoconcept. Socio- and psycholinguistic

studies, 3, 7-13.

Kolbovskiy, E. Yu. (2008). Landshaftovedenie: ucheb.p dlya stud. vyssh. uchebn. zavedenii [Landscape science: Textbook for students of higher

educational institutions]. Moscow: Academia.

Malinetsky, G. G., Manenkov, S. K., Mitin, N. A., & Shishov, V. V. (2011). A cognitive challenge and information technologies. Economic Strategies, 9. Retrieved August 29, 2022, from http://www.inesnet.ru/wp-content/mag_archive/2011_09/ES2011-09-malinetsky.pdf

Milkov, F. N. (1966). Landshaftnaya geografiya i voprosy praktiki [Landscape geography and issues of practice]. Moscow: Mysl.

Nefedova, T. G., & Pallot, J. (2006). Unknown agrarian sector, or why you need a cow. Moscow: Novoe Izdatelstvo.

Pankov, S. V. (2011). Geografiya selskikh poselenii tsentralnogo Chernozemya (evolyutsiya, morfologiya, struktura) [Geography of rural

settlements in Central Black Earth Region (evolution, morphology, structure)] [Doctor of Geography Dissertation]. Voronezh.

Rodoman, B. B. (2002). Polyarizovannaya biosfera: Sbornik statei [Polarized Biosphere: A collection of articles]. Smolensk: Oikumena.

Savitsky, P. N. (2010). Izbrannye trudy [Selected works]. Moscow: ROSPEN.

Zamyatin, D. N. (2015). Geokulturnaya regionalnaya politika i geokulturnyi brending territorii: kontseptualnye skhemy issledovaniya

[Geocultural regional policy and geocultural branding of territory: Conceptual research schemes]. Retrieved from https://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/35067/1/brcy-2015-07.pdf

Zhuchenko, A. A. (2009). Starting opportunity of Russia agriculture sector in XXI century. Agrarnyi vestnik Yugo-Vostoka, 1, 6-11.