Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.69.1852Keywords:
Siberia, wooden architecture, modern, identity, regional architectureAbstract
Globalization and widespread active introduction of architectural forms, techniques, materials and building technologies pose a
problem of finding regional identity, particularity and uniqueness of the style in architecture. Consideration of history and traditions of regional architecture is one of the ways to reveal this identity and uniqueness. Wooden architecture is traditional for Siberia. It has hardly evolved stylistically since the 1920s. Studying stylistic formation in wooden architecture of Siberia in the late 19th – early 20th centuries, including modern, will help to identify the peculiarities of the local style and culture. The style can be considered from the point of view of philosophy of architecture and art as a unique manifestation of regional culture, as one of the ways to create (recreate) cultural identity, particularity and uniqueness, and as a source of information on a variety of techniques and forms of wooden architecture in Siberia.
How to Cite
Published
Issue
Section
References
Abolina, L. A., & Fedorov, R. Yu. (2016). Razvitie traditsii russkogo narodnogo zodchestva na primere derevyannoi arkhitektury Eniseiska [Development of traditions of the Russian folk architecture through the example of Yeniseisk wooden architecture]. Vestnik Tomskogo gos. un-ta, 407, 25-31.
Bolshoi entsiklopedichesky slovar [Great encyclopaedical dictionary] (n.d.). Retrieved June 1, 2021, from https://gufo.me/dict/bes
Dymchenko, M. E. (2018). Forma i material v arkhitekture: protivorechiya moderna [The form and material in architecture: contradictions of modern]. Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitelstvo. Nedvizhimost, 8(2), 194–205.
Ivin, A. A. (Ed.) (2004). Filosofiya: entsikloped. slovar [Philosophy: Encyclopaedical Dictionary]. Moscow: Gardariki.
Kapustin, P., & Astashov, D. (2020). Borisoglebsk. Identity of a small town. Project Baikal, 17(65), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.65.1674
Orlova, E. A. (2013). Modern kak kulturnyi stil [Modern as a cultural style]. Observatoriya kultury, 4, 6–25.
Pigalev, A. I. (2018). Drugoi v diskurse moderna i transkulturatsiya metafiziki [The other in the discourse of modernity and the transculturation of metaphysics]. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federalnogo universiteta. Ser. Gumanitarnye i sotsialnye nauki, 2, 51–61.
Rendl, M. V. (2016). Sociocultural foundations of modern society: Conceptualization of the idea of “emancipation” of individuality. Humanities of the South of Russia, 22(6), 142–148.
Reshchikova, S. P. (2014). Evolyutsiya predstavlenii ob arkhitekture v filosofskoi mysli: Platon, Schopenhauer, Gadamer [Evolution of ideas about architecture in philosophical thought: Plato, Schopenhauer, Gadamer]. Vestnik Yuzhno-Uralskogo gos. un-ta. Ser. Sots.-guman. Nauki, 14(4), 83-87. Chelyabinsk: Izd-vo YuUrGU.
Shchenkov, A., & Antonova, N. (2020). Architectural heritage and identity of Russian cities. Project Baikal, 17(65), 27-31. https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.65.1670
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Programme and Budget for 2018-2021: General Conference. Retrieved October 12, 2020, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000248256_rus
United Nations Organization. Resolution. Agenda items 15 and 116. Retrieved July 22, 2020, from https://undocs.org/ru/A/RES/70/1
Ustyugova, E. N. (2006). Stil i kultura: opyt postroeniya obshchei territorii stilya [Style and culture: Practices of the formation of common theory of the style] (2nd ed). Saint Petersburg.
