Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.66.1714Keywords:
style, architecture, succession, classicism, modernism, constructivism, history, fashionAbstract
Using the example of the transformations of French classicism, the author examines the ways and means of its succession in subsequent styles. It is shown how the attempts to build upon the classical style give rise to shocking and grotesque forms, which paradoxically help to develop the aesthetic principles of the very style that innovators and revolutionaries are trying to subvert. Conversely, formal imitation leads to the hollowing out of the original style, to the substitution of its emotional content while preserving external attributes.
How to Cite
Published
Issue
Section
References
Breton, G. (2013). Napoleon i zhenshchiny [Napoleon and women]. Moscow: Eterna.
Chukovsky, N. (1925). Nasha kukhnya [Our kitchen]. Leningrad: Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo.
Durand, J.-N.-L. (1802). Précis des leçons d'architecture données à l'école polytechnique. Vol 1. Paris: Bernard. https://archive.org/details/prcisdesleon02dura
Kaufmann, E. (1933). Von Ledoux bis Le Corbusier: Ursprung und Entwicklung der autonomen Architektur. Leipzig; Wien: Verlag Dr. R.Passer.
Kharms, D. (1930). Million. Moscow: OGIZ – Molodaya gvardiya.
Lissitzky, El. (1922). Suprematicheskii skaz pro dva kvadrata v 6-ti postroikakh [A suprematic tale of two squares in 6 constructions]. Berlin: Skify.
Mayakovsky, V. (1923). Dlya golosa [For the voice]. Berlin: Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo R.S.F.S.R.
Sablin, I. D. (2019). Ot Ledu do Le Corbusier… i obratno: k istoriografii revolyutsionnoi arkhitektury [From Ledu to Le Corbusier… and backwards: to historiography of revolutionary architecture]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Iskusstvovedenie, Vol. 9, issue 4, 688-697.