Province vs Colony: Two paradigms of cultural interaction

Authors

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.65.1668

Keywords:

social psychology, history, culture, imperialism, metropolis, colony, province, architecture

Abstract

The article considers two paradigms of the center-periphery interaction in the mixed and multiethnic systems. The historical examples show the peculiarities of the colonial paradigm where the peripheral culture is suppressed and displaced by the culture of the center (metropolis). The eparchial paradigm is based on cross-cultural interaction and enrichment between the center and the provinces. Within the final decades of the 20th century, the eparchial principle was replaced by the “cultural colonization” on the global scale. As a result, the “global West” culture is degrading to its lowest terms, which has a negative impact on the sphere of education.

How to Cite

Lidin, K., & Belobrykina, O. (2021). Province vs Colony: Two paradigms of cultural interaction. Project Baikal, 17(65), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.65.1668

Published

2021-01-05

Issue

No. 65 (2020): province

Section

refereed articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Konstantin Lidin, Olga Belobrykina

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Arendt, H. (1996). Istoki totalitarizma [The origins of totalitarianism]. Moscow: TsentrKom.

Belobrykina, O. A. (2019). Differentsialnye deskriptory subyektivnogo perezhivaniya odinochestva podrostkami. Chast II. Rezultaty empiricheskogo issledovaniya [Differential descriptors of teenagers’ subjective feelings of longliness. Part II. Results of an empirical study]. Institut psikhologii Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Sotsialnaya i ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya. Vol. 4, 3(15), 158-192.

Defoe, D. (1995). Dalneishie priklyucheniya Robinzona Kruzo [The further adventures of Robinson Crusoe]. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura.

Etkind, A. (2011). Internal Colonization: Russia’s Imperial Experience. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Golovnyev, A. V. (2015). Fenomen kolonizatsii [Colonization phenomenon]. Yekaterinburg: Izd-vo UrO RAN.

Haushofer, K. (2001). O geopolitike [On the geopolitics]. Moscow: Mysl.

Herodotus (1972). Isoriya [History]. In nine books (G. A. Stratanovsky, Trans.). Book V. Leningrad: Nauka.

Hussar, B., Zhang, J., Hein, S., Wang, K., Roberts, A., Cui, J., Smith, M., Bullock, Mann F., Barmer, A., & Dilig,

R. (2020). The Condition of Education 2020 (NCES 2020-144). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Irkutsk (Pavlov) school. (2020). Project Baikal, 17(64), 73-108.

Lidin, K. (2014). Tomorrow began yesterday. Project Baikal, 1(39-40), 38-42. doi:10.7480/projectbaikal.39-40.648

Onfrey, M., & McClellan, J. A. (2015). Hedonist Manifesto: The Power to Exist. NY: Columbia University Press.

Ó GrÓda, C. (2012). Eating People Is Wrong, and Other Essays on Famine, Its Past, and Its Future. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Polyakov, E. N., & Krasovskii, A. V. (2017). Vnutrennee prostranstvo drevnegrecheskogo usadebnogo doma V-I vv. do n.e. [Inner space of the ancient Greek manor house in the 5th-1st centuries BC]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitelnogo universiteta, 3(62), 9-24.

Said, E.W. (1993). Culture and Imperialism. London: Random House.

Saltykov-Shchedrin, M. E. (1970). Gospoda tashkentsy [The Tashkenters clique]. In The collected works in 20 vols (Vol. 10, pp. 7-271).

Thompson, J. (2016). Becoming an Architect: Narratives of Architectural Education. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. University of Washington.

UNESCO (2020). Global Education Monitoring Report 2020: Inclusion and education: All means all. Paris: UNESCO.