Швы и шрамы архитектурной мысли

Авторы

  • Петр Капустин Воронежский государственный технический университет

Загрузки

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51461/pb.74.22

Ключевые слова:

«лоскутность» архитектурной мысли, интерпретация, инклюзивность в архитектуре, креативность и индивидуация в архитектуре, архитектурное темпоральное

Аннотация

Мышление альтернативами и оппозициями – классический ход организации всякой значимой мысли – от греческих апорий до журнала «Oppositions» Питера Айзенмана. Таким приемом можно не только удержать разное в единстве представления, но и сохранять надежду на синтез – третий путь; надежду далеко не всегда иллюзорную. Неисчерпаемым источником, а также базовым механизмом порождения альтернатив и оппозиций является интерпретация – загадочная способность, расположенная за гранью семиологии и чаемой ею «прозрачности знака». В различных масштабах и на различающемся материале в статье проводится оценка основных видов ресурсов развития архитектурно-проектной мысли нашего времени в их наиболее значимых, по мнению автора, альтернативах и оппозициях.

Как цитировать

Капустин, П. (2023). Швы и шрамы архитектурной мысли. проект байкал, 19(74), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.51461/pb.74.22

Опубликован

2023-01-05

Выпуск

№ 74 (2022): альтернативы

Раздел

refereed articles - рецензируемые статьи

Лицензия

Лицензия Creative Commons

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.

Библиографические ссылки

Alexander, C. (1965, April). A City is Not a Tree. Architectural Forum, 122(1), 58-62.

Bagina, E. (2019). Art Deco: The Western Hedonism and the Soviet Romance. Project Baikal, 16(62), 120-125. https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.62.1559

Barthes, R. (2000). Mythologies. Moscow: Sabashnikov Publishing House.

Baudrillard, J. (2000). Symbolic Exchange and Death. Moscow: Dobrosvet.

Christensen, B. T., & Ball, L. J. (2019, November). Building a discipline: Indicators of expansion, integration and consolidation in design research across four decades, Design Studies, 65,. 18-34.

Foucault, M. (1994). Nietzsche, Freud, Marx. Kentavr, 2, 48-56. Retrieved September 6, 2022, from http://lib.ru/CULTURE/FUKO/nfm.txt

Johnson, Ph. (1977). Reflections: On Style and International Style; On Post-modernism, On Architecture. Oppositions, 10.

Kapustin, P. (1996). Notes on the System Typology of Ontological Forms of Design Thinking. In R. Trappl (Ed.), Cybernetics and Systems,

Proceedings of the EMCSR’96 (pp. 367-372). Vienna.

Kapustin, P. V. (2012a). Proektnoe myshlenie i arkhitekturnoe soznanie: Kriticheskoe vvedenie v ontologiyu i fenomenologiyu arkhitekturnogo

proektirovaniya (monografiya) [Design Thinking and Architectural Consciousness: A Critical Introduction to Ontology and Phenomenology of Architectural Design (monograph)]. Saarbrucken, Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing.

Kapustin, P. V. (2012b). Utopia in the evolution of architectural design. Part III. Depicting Utopia. Architecton: Proceedings of higher education, 1(37). Retrieved September 6, 2022, from http://archvuz.ru/2012_1/1/

Kapustin, P. V. (2017a). “Antiarkhitektura” – Proektirovanie – Sreda: “Otsutstvuyushchee” i ego otrazheniya [“Anti-Architecture” – Designing – Environment: The “absent” and its reflections]. In I. A. Dobritsyna (Ed.), Problems of the Theory of Architecture. Architecture: Modern Experience of Professional Self-Reflection: Collection of scientific papers and reports at the Ninth and Tenth Ikonnikov Readings (pp. 52-57). Moscow: LENAND.

Kapustin, P. V. (2017b). Sushchestvovalo li “arkhitekturnoe proektirovanie”? [Did “architectural design” exist?]. In I. A. Dobritsyna (Ed.), Problems of the Theory of Architecture. Architecture: Modern Experience of Professional Self-Reflection: Collection of scientific papers and reports at the Ninth and Tenth Ikonnikov Readings (pp. 75-87). Moscow: LENAND.

Kapustin, P. V. (2017c). The types of professionalism in architectural education. Project Baikal, 14(53), 50-53. https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.53.1211

Kapustin, P. V. (2019). Theory of architecture: From problems of understanding to organization ideas. Architecture and Construction of Russia, 4(232), 22-27.

Kapustin, P. (2020a). Art Deco: Harsh fruits of a deserted garden. Project Baikal, 17(63), 142-148. https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.63.1610

Kapustin, P. V. (2020b). Krizis temporalnogo voobrazheniya i novye vozmozhnosti teorii arkhitektury [The crisis of temporal imagination and new possibilities of the theory of architecture]. In I. A. Dobritsyna (Ed.), Theory and History of Architecture. Issue 1: Proceedings of the Eleventh Ikonnikov Readings (pp. 238-250). Branch of FGBU “TsNIIP Minstroya Rossii”, Research Institute for Theory and History of Architecture and Urban Planning. Moscow; Saint Petersburg: Kolo. Retrieved September 6, 2022, from http://www.sectioaureaseries.org/uploads/releases_PDF/001/ТИА1_Капустин.pdf

Kapustin, P. V. (2021a). Environment versus architecture: collision of professional consciousness. Architecture and Construction of Russia,

(238), 15-20.

Kapustin, P. V. (2021b). K probleme “iskusstvennogo” i “estestvennogo” v proektirovanii [To the problem of the “artificial” and “natural” in

design]. Architectural Research. Scientific journal. Voronezh: Voronezh State Technical University, 4(28), 4-9.

Kapustin, P. V. (2021c). Paradoxes and prospects of the glocal. Project Baikal, 18(69), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.69.1842

Levintov, A. E. (1991). Ot raiona k region: na puti k khozyaistvennoi geografii [From a district to a region: On the way to economic geography]. Voprosy metodologii, 3. Retrieved September 6, 2022, from https://www.fondgp.ru/old/lib/journals/vm/1991/3/v913lev0.html

Loos, A. (1972). Ornament i prestuplenie [Ornament and a crime]. In Masters of Architecture about architecture (pp. 143-148). Moscow: Art.

Marcuse, H. (2002). Eros and civilization. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Moscow: AST Publishing House.

Rappaport, A. G. (2014, November 27). Kult i magiya v arkhitekture [Cult and magic in architecture]. A. G. Rappaport’s blog “The Tower and the Labyrinth”. Retrieved September 6, 2022, from http://papardes.blogspot.com/2014/11/83.html

Revzin, G. (2021, October 31). Nauka i magiya. Pochemu arkhitektory perestali byt kreativnym klassom? [Science and Magic. Why architects

ceased to be a creative class?]. ARCHI.RU. Retrieved September 6, 2022, from https://archi.ru/russia/94608/nauka-i-magiya

Rowe, C., & Ketter, F. (2019). Collage City. Moscow: Strelka Press.

Savarenskaya, T. F. (1987). Zapadnoevropeiskoe gradostroitelstvo XVII-XIX vekov. Esteticheskie i teoreticheskie predposylki [Western European urban planning in the 17th and 19th centuries. Aesthetic and theoretical preconditions]. Moscow: Stroyizdat.

Schumacher, P. (2009, November/December). Patterns of Architecture. AD Architectural Design, 79(6).

Semper, G. (1970). Prakticheskaya estetika [Practical aesthetics]. Moscow: Art.

Simondon, G. (n.d.). On the mode of existence of technical objects. Academia. Retrieved September 6, 2022, from https://www.academia.edu/15414715/

Venturi, R. (1972). From the book “Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture”. In Masters of Architecture on Architecture (pp. 543-558).

Moscow: Art.