Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51461/issn.2309-3072/82.2423Keywords:
technological mode, spatial planning, phase of technological mode, analysis of countries’ experience, comparability of countries, system approachAbstract
The article substantiates the possibility of creating a systematic approach to the analysis of countries’ experience in spatial planning through the lens of technological modes. The basis for the creation of such an approach is the proposed conceptual scheme of validity of the choice of directions for analysing spatial planning systems. It is shown that the close relationship between the level of the country’s economy and the phase of its technological mode allows us to propose a classification of countries and possible directions for analysing their spatial planning systems. The authors substantiate the objectivity of the obtained comparability of countries when analysing their spatial planning systems.
How to Cite
Published
Issue
Section
References
Aytova, A. V. (2021). International experience in strategic spatial planning of cities. Proceedings of the conference: Razvitie kreativnykh industriy v sovremennom mire (pp. 9-14).
Fedorov, G. M. (2014). Border position as a factor of strategic and territorial planning in Russian regions in the Baltic. Baltic Region, 3(21), 71–82.
Fedulova, S. I. (2017). Prostranstvennoe planirovanie v stranakh Evropeiskogo soyuza i v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: Geograficheskie osobennosti, luchshie praktiki [Spatial planning in the European Union and the Russian Federation: geographical peculiarities, best practices] [Geography PhD Dissertation]. Saint Petersburg.
Glazyev, S. Yu. (2019). O neravnomernosti sovremennogo ekonomicheskogo rosta kak protsessa razvitiya i smeny tekhnologocheskikh ukladov [On the unevenness of current economic growth as a process of development and change of technological modes]. Sociology, 4, 42-52.
Gumenyuk, I. S. (2016). On the relation between spatial concepts, strategic and territorial planning in the Russian Federation in the context of the development of the Kaliningrad/Vistula Lagoon region. Vestnik of Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal Universitety, 1, 37–44.
Kholyavko, S. I. (2014). The Swedish model of spatial planning: functions, problems and solutions. Vestnik of Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal Universitety, 7, 159–168.
Minakir, P. A. (2016). The national strategy of spatial development: Is it the conscientious delusion or deliberate simplification? Spatial Economics, 3, 7-15.
Proskurnova, K. Yu. (2021). Spatial planning vs territorial planning – areas of concern of the content of regional planning types. Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 19(10 (493)), 1897–1913.
Ryumina, E. V., & Anikina, A. M. (2007). Analyzing the impact of the natural resources factor on the level of economic development of Russian regions. Problemy Prognozirovaniya, 5, 106–125.
Spiridonov, V. Yu., & Kopneeva, Yu. V. (2020). Spatial planning of cities: Advanced technologies for sustainable development of territories. Architecture, Urbanism and Design, 24, 3-11. Retrieved August 20, 2024, from https://aud.susu.ru/images/AGD24/AGD24_3-11.pdf
Stead, D. (2012). Best practices and policy transfer in spatial planning. Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), 103–116.
Ubushiev, E. V. (2018). Economic security in various technological modes. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 3, 1-21. Retrieved from https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=27119
UNITED NATIONS. (2008). Spatial planning: Key Instrument for Development and Effective Governance with Special Reference to Countries in Transition. New York; Geneva. Retrieved from https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2022-01/spatial_planning_e.pdf
Zagidyllina, G. M., & Sobolev, E. A. (2014). Technological structures, their importance and role in the development of innovative economy in Russia. News of the Kazan State University of Architecture and Engineering, 4(30), 348-355.
