Urban studies in Russia: Sociality relay races Authors Yulia Kozlova Moscow City University Downloads PDF (Русский) DOI: https://doi.org/10.51461/issn.2309-3072/80.2338 Keywords: types of sociality, urbanism, sociology of the city, scientific (intellectual) network, the right to your city, epistemological urbanism Abstract This article aims to show the interdependence of science and society by the example of the development of the national sociology of the city (social urbanism). The author proposes а new approach to the periodization of the development of Russian urban sociology based on the prevailing type of sociality. The idea is that the social nature of the modern city determines the need for a new scientific direction, ‘epistemological urbanism’, the construction of a discursive meta-model of modern domestic urbanism, which integrates an internal (cognitive-research), external (normative-communicative) and open (general cultural) sociality. The article solves the problem of systemic characteristics of the epistemological and substantive content of Russian social urbanism at different stages of its formation, current social status and development vectors. The methodological basis of the study is the typology of sociality (I. T. Kasavin). The study also uses the typology of theoretical discourses of urbanism (E. Soja) and the periodization of Russian urbanism based on the typology of social structure (O. N. Yanitsky). How to Cite Kozlova, Y. (2024). Urban studies in Russia: Sociality relay races. Project Baikal, 21(80), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.51461/issn.2309-3072/80.2338 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Published 2024-08-09 Issue No. 80 (2024): image of the future Section refereed articles License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. References Dikansky, M. G. (1926). Problemy sovremennykh gorodov: Dvizhenie v bolshikh gorodakh. Krizis zhilishcha [Problems of modern cities: Traffic in big cities. Housing crisis]. Moscow: Voprosy truda. Grevs, I. M. (1925). Priroda ekskursionnosti i glavnye tipy ekskursii v kulturu [The nature of excursions and the main types of excursions to culture]. In I. M. Grevs (Ed.), Ekskursii v kulturu [Excursions to culture]. Moscow: Mir. Ilyin, L. A. (1921). Evolyutsiya gradostroitelstva [The evolution of urban planning]. In Public Utilities and Construction, 1, 11-23. Kasavin, I. T. (2006). Sotsialnaya epistemologiya: ponyatie i problemy [Social Epistemology: Concept and Problems]. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 7(1), 5-15. Klimovitskiy, S. V., & Osipov, G. V. (2019). Digital inequality and its social consequences. Humanities, Social-Economic and Social Ssciences, 2, 47-51. Kozlova, Yu. V. (2022). Social justice in the context of epistemological urbanism. Russian Studies in Culture and Society, 6(1), 59-73. Ozerov, I. Kh. (1906). Bolshie goroda, ikh zadachi i sredstva upravleniya [Big cities, their tasks and management tools] (2 ed.). Moscow: Tov-vo I. D. Sytina. Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (2009). Vremya, khaos, kvant: K resheniyu paradoksa vremeni [Time. Chaos. Quantum: Towards the solution of the time paradox]. Moscow: URSS. Privalov, M. (2018). “Needless people” of the 21st century as a problem of urban studies and not only. Project Baikal, 15(57), 87-93. https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.57.1361 Savchenko, I. A., & Kozlova, Yu. V. (2022). “The Right to your city”: A project of the epistemological urban studies. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 59(3), 185-201. Soja, E. W. (2001). Postmetropolis: Critical studies of cities and regions. Oxford; Malden (Mass.): Blackwell. Stramentov, A. E. (1963). Vvedenie v gorodskoe stroitelstvo: (lektsii o sovetskom gorode): uchebnik dlya studentov vuzov, obuchayushchikhsya na I kurse po spetsialnosti “Gorodskoe stroitelstvo i khozyaistvo” [Introduction to urban construction: (lectures on the Soviet city): textbook for university students studying in the first year in the specialty “Urban construction and economy”]. Moscow: Gosstrojizdat. Yakshin, A. M., Govorenkova, T. M., Kagan, M. I., Merkulova, Z. E., & Strelnikov, A. I. (1979). Grafoanaliticheskii metod v gradostroitelnykh issledovaniyakh i proektirovanii [Graphoanalytic method in urban planning research and design]. Moscow: Strojizdat. Yanitsky, O. N. (2002). “V obshchestve menya vsegda interesovala obratnaya storona medali [“In society, I have always been interested in the reverse side of the medal...”]. Sociological Journal, 1, 152-174. Yanitsky, O. N. (2019). Rossiiskie megapolisy v usloviyakh novykh sotsialno-ekologicheskikh vyzovov: Zadachi proekta i metody ikh resheniya [Russian megacities in the context of new socio-environmental challenges: Project objectives and methods of their solution]. Coevolution and the Noosphere: Research, Analytics, Forecasting, 2(8), 5-24.