Typology of ancient cities of Asia Minor according to their location and orientation Authors Alexander Kolesnikov National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering Maxim Tatarinov Downloads PDF (Русский) DOI: https://doi.org/10.51461/issn.2309-3072/78.2255 Keywords: polis, chora, demos, asti, sympolitia, Hellenistic, Roman, settlement system, sustainable development Abstract The aim of the article is to describe the urban structure of the ancient polis and inter-polis spaces as they were in the period of mature antiquity, and to determine the regularities of their formation and development. The article uses materials of expeditions to Asia Minor, modern Turkey, historical sources, as well as cartographic materials and satellite data. A reconstructive map of Asia Minor and its fragments is drawn up. The territory, which approximately repeated the outlines of the Seleucid Empire and the Kingdom of Pergamon later conquered by Rome, was chosen because it contained the most typical poleis with a variety of locations, sizes and compositions, convenient for analysing their urban structure. The article considers the basic principles of planning and location of central cities. It develops a typology of the siting of the cities and the criteria on the basis of which these cities were located. The authors give examples of the most typical and representative layouts. How to Cite Kolesnikov, A., & Tatarinov, M. (2023). Typology of ancient cities of Asia Minor according to their location and orientation. Project Baikal, 20(78), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.51461/issn.2309-3072/78.2255 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Published 2023-12-17 Issue No. 78 (2023): theories and practice Section refereed articles License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. References Åhlfeldt, J. (2017). Digital atlas of the Roman empire. Gothenburg Research Infrastructure in Digital Humanities, University of Gothenburg. Version 1. https://dh.gu.se/resource/6 Hansen, M. H., & Nielsen, T. H. (2004). An Inventory of Archaic and Classical Poleis. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Haverfield, F. (1913). Ancient town-planning. Oxford. Kolb, F., & Thomsen, A. (2004). Forschungen zu Zentralorten und Chora auf dem Gebiet von Kyaneai (Zentrallykien): Methoden, Ergebnisse, Probleme. In F. Kolb (Ed.), Chora und Polis (pp. 1-42). R. Oldenbourg Verlag München. Korkut, T. (2015). Tlos. İstanbul. Ramsay, W. M. (1890). The Historical Geography of Asia Minor. Schuler, C. (2004). Politische Organisationsformen auf dem Territorium von Kyaneai. In F. Kolb (Ed.), Chora und Polis (pp. 87-102). R. Oldenbourg Verlag München. Spratt, T. A. B., & Forbes, E. (1867). Travels in Lycia, Milyas, and the Cibyratis. London. Stillwell, R. (1976). The Princeton Encyclopedia of Classical Sites. Retrieved from http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/ Tabula Imperii Byzantini (TIB). (n.d.). Austrian Institute for Medieval Research. https://tib.oeaw.ac.at/ Talbert, R. J. A. (Ed.). (2000). Barrington Atlas of the Greek and Roman World. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Teorii vlasti [Theories of power]. (2015). In S. A. Zhebelev, Trans., Aristotle (384-322 BC). Politics. Moscow: Academichesky proekt.