The knowledge status in the paradigms of urban studies

Authors

  • Yulia Kozlova Moscow City University

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51461/issn.2309-3072/78.2232

Keywords:

urban studies, urban discourse, modern city, postmodern city, meta-studies of the city

Abstract

The social nature of the city, its landscape and architectural, iconic and system codes ensure cultural continuity and unity of society. The article presents a comparative analysis of the concepts of the city in the era of modern, postmodern (“second modern”) and metamodern. In order to identify the basic approaches to the comprehensive study of the city, the context of urban research is characterized at each stage of the development of scientific knowledge, and the discourse of the most significant concepts is determined. The author substantiates the necessity for modern urbanism to apply a meta-research approach to its object.

How to Cite

Kozlova, Y. (2023). The knowledge status in the paradigms of urban studies. Project Baikal, 20(78), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.51461/issn.2309-3072/78.2232

Published

2023-12-17

Issue

No. 78 (2023): theories and practice

Section

refereed articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Aureli, P. V. (2014). Vozmozhnost absolyutnoj arkhitektury [The possibility of an absolute architecture]. Moscow: Strelka.

Barthes, R. (1988). Semiology and Urbanism. In R. Howard (Trans.), The Semiotic Challenge (pp. 191-201). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Bauman, Z. (2008). Tekuchaya sovremennost [Liquid modernity] (Yu. V. Asochakov, Ed.). SPb.: Piter.

Beck, U. (2000). Obshhestvo riska: Na puti k drugomu modernu [Risk society: Towards a new modernity] (V. Sedelnik & N. Fedorova, Trans.). Moscow: Progress-Tradiciya.

Collins, R. (2002). Sociologiya filosofij: globalnaya teoriya intellektualnogo izmeneniya [The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change]. Novosibirsk: Sib. khronograf.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2005). The Rhizome (A thousand plateaus, Ch. 1). Almanakh “Vostok”, 11-12.

Derrida, J. (2000). O grammatologii [Of grammatology] (N. Avtonomova, Trans.). Moscow: Ad Marginem.

Eco, U. (2019). Otsutstvuyushhaya struktura. La struttura assente: Vvedenie v semiologiyu [The absent structure: Introduction to semiotics]. Moscow: Corpus; AST.

Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault (L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton, Eds.). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

Landry, Ch. (2006). Kreativnyi gorod [The creative city]. Moscow: Izdatelskij dom “Klassika-XXI”.

Plato (2006). Gorgias. In: A. F. Losev, V. F. Asmus (Eds.), Collection of works in 4 vols (Vol. 1, p. 369). SPb.

Rowe, C., & Koetter, F. (2018). Gorod-kollazh [Collage city]. Moscow: Strelka Press.

Soja, E. W. (2000). Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Regions (1st ed.). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.

Stas, I. N. (2012). Koncept ‘gorod’ v postmodernistskoj istoriografii [City concept in postmodern historiography]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 11(266), 154-159.

Suvorov, N. N. (2020). Novizna v spektre kulturnykh izmenenij XX-XXI vekov: modern, postmodern, metamodern [Novelty in the spectrum of cultural changes of the XX-XXI centuries: Modern, postmodern, metamodern]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta kultury,1(42), 82-89.

Turner, T. (1995). City as Landscape: A Post Post-modern View of Design and Planning. London: Taylor & Francis.

Weber, M. (1994). Gorod [The city]. In Izbrannoe. Obraz obshhestva. Moscow: Yurist.

Yang, J., & Valdes-Cotera, R. (Eds.). (2011). Conceptual evolution and policy developments in lifelong learning (pp. 210, 212). Hamburg.