Architectural theory and practice

Authors

  • Alexander Rappaport

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51461/issn.2309-3072/78.2224

Keywords:

theory, practice, design activity, architecture

Abstract

A practice is an activity that fulfils the tasks given by the administration or ordered for money. Such practice (design activity) does not need the theory of architecture. Architects-designers ignore it for a reason. The well-known paradox “there is nothing more practical than a good theory”, however, can be applied in the field of architecture. The idea of fundamental independence of theory and practice in architecture (and not only) is justified by the fact that it is impossible to know in advance how theoretical ideas will affect practice. The value of theoretical ideas is not diminished by the fact that they are not currently applied in practice and have no economic effect.

How to Cite

Rappaport, A. (2023). Architectural theory and practice. Project Baikal, 20(78), 18–21. https://doi.org/10.51461/issn.2309-3072/78.2224

Published

2023-12-17

Issue

Section

refereed articles

References

Baratynsky, E. (1840). Vse mysl da mysl! [Thought, yet more thought!]. Retrieved September 10, 2023, from https://www.culture.ru/poems/26031/vsyo-mysl-da-mysl

Rappaport, A. (2022). Why architectural theory is not developing. Project Baikal, 19(72), 161-162. https://projectbaikal.com/index.php/pb/article/view/2128

Rappaport, A. G., & Somov, G. Yu. (1990). Forma v arkhitekture. Teorii i metodologiya [Form in Architecture. Theories and methodology]. Moscow: Stroyizdat.