Genius Loci and/or Zeitgeist?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51461/issn.2309-3072/77.2187

Keywords:

architecture, urbanism, history, style, Genius Loci, Zeitgeist

Abstract

The article considers the concepts of Genius Loci and Zeitgeist and shows the contradictions between these two aspects and their influence on the development of architecture. It is concluded that the predominance of the Genius of Place forms a gravitation towards sedentarisation and diversity of local architectural forms. The predominance of the Spirit of the Time stimulates the development of uniform international architectural styles that ignore the peculiarities of landscape and scenery. During the twentieth century, the development of architecture was mainly shaped by the Spirit of Time, which gave rise to a multitude of “small styles”, each of which aggressively claims a dominant, monopolistic role on a global scale, but actually exists for a very short time and is quickly replaced by the next fashionable style, equally short-lived. The last “big” style built on a deep philosophical and attitudinal basis is the style of “brutalism – deconstructivism”, which was able to achieve a balance between the Genius of Place and the Spirit of the Time.

How to Cite

Lidin, K. (2023). Genius Loci and/or Zeitgeist?. Project Baikal, 20(77), 52–55. https://doi.org/10.51461/issn.2309-3072/77.2187

Published

2023-10-29

Issue

Section

refereed articles

References

Chambless, E. (1910, reprint 2017). Roadtown. NY: Andesite Press.

Kopylova, L. (2023). New Urbanism in Europe and the USA: National schools. Project Baikal, 20(76), 134-147. https://doi.org/10.51461/issn.2309-3072/76.2165

Lidin, K. (2015). Urbanship: In search for a comprehensive definition of urban environment. Project Baikal, 12(45), 84-89. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7022-6871

van Schaik, M., & Máčel, O. (Eds.). (2005). Exit Utopia-Architectural Provocations 1956-76. Munich: Prestel.