Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51461/issn.2309-3072/76.2142Keywords:
centre, periphery, province, region, frontier, territory, placeAbstract
Not so long ago it seemed that the problem of borders remained only in philosophical, artistic and epistemological contexts. Regions had no borders. They were perceived as peripheries, regardless of their location. Regions do not want to be identified with a hinterland, that is why we have “centres” everywhere. In the hindermost of the villages, there are several “centres”: shopping, leisure, cultural, religious, etc. While thinking only in terms of centres, clusters and nodes, we tend to overlook a large part of the world that consists of peripheries, provinces, suburbs, hinterlands... It is time to rethink this trend and to look into the key concepts. Especially as today there is a good reason to recall the concept of the frontier and to newly distinguish it from the border. Rethinking, on the other hand, opens up a new, unexpected structure of the world, with which the known types of activity are hardly familiar.
How to Cite
Published
Issue
Section
References
Alexander, Ch., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (2014). A Pattern language: Towns. Buildings. Construction. Moscow: Artemy Lebedev Studio.
Bagina, E. (2017). On provinciality, greed and aspiration for a metropolitan life. Project Baikal, 14(52), 62-63. https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.52.1164
Frolova, A. (2017, December 2). Chto takoe “territoriya”? Znachenie slova [What is “territory”? The meaning of the word]. FB. Retrieved March 25, 2023, from https://fb.ru/article/361595/chto-takoe-territoriya-znache-nie-slova
Glazychev, V. L. (2003). Glubinnaya Rossiya: 2000-2002 [Deep Russia: 2000-2002]. Moscow: Novoye Izd-vo.
Heidegger, M. (n.d.). Tvorcheskiy landshaft: Pochemu my ostaemsya v provintsii? [Creative Landscape: Why do we stay in the province?]. Retrieved March 23, 2023, from https://askrsvarte.org/blog/v...provincii/
Kapustin, P. V. (2012). Opyt fenomenologicheskogo analiza arkhitekturno-proektnoi kategorii “mesto” [Experience of phenomenological analysis of architectural and design category of “place”]. Architecture and design in contemporary society: Russian experience and global trends. Proceedings of all-Russian scientific conference, October 23-24, 2012 (pp. 40-42). Ekaterinburg: Architecton.
Kapustin, P. V. (2012, December 4). Smysly, kak I vse “gumanitarnoe”, davno otneseny k fakultativnoi chasti. Kommentarii Petra Kapustina k lektsii Aleksandra Rappaporta [Meanings, like everything “humanitarian”, have long been relegated to the elective part. Commentary of Petr Kapustin to the lecture of Alexander Rappaport]. ARCHI.ru. Retrieved March 25, 2023, from http://archi.ru/agency/news_current.html?nid=45112
Kapustin, P. (2017). West East: Imagining the Line. Project Baikal, 14(54), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.54.1251
Kapustin, P. (2019). A “healthy city” and a living place. Project Baikal, 16(60), 90-95. https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.60.1479
Kapustin, P. (2020). Regional schools: From projects to hopes. Project Baikal, 17(65), 168-171. https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.65.1703
Kopylov, G. G. (1993). Region-set i regionalnye programmy [Region as a network and regional programs]. Kentavr, 2, 16-22. Retrieved March 23, 2023, from https://www.kentavr.mathedu.ru/text/kentavr_1993_2
Levintov, A. E. (1991). Ot raiona k region: Na puti k khozyaistvennoi geografii [From district to region: On the way to economic geography. Voprosy metodologii, 3, 45-52. Retrieved March 23, 2023, from
Lynch, K. (1982). The image of the city. Moscow: Stroyizdat.
Rappaport, A. (2017). On provincialism. Project Baikal, 14(52), 50-52. https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.52.1161
Shchipkov, V. A. (2017). Regionalism kak ideologiya globalizma: Monografiya [Regionalism as the ideology of globalism: A monograph]. Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet.
