Explication of postmodern philosophy ideas in architecture

Authors

  • Elnara Dumnova Novosibirsk State University of Economics and Management
  • Oleg Romannikov Kryachkov Novosibirsk State University of Architecture, Design and Arts
  • Tatyana Gudkova Novosibirsk State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.72.2000

Keywords:

postmodern philosophy, nonlinear development, architectural postmodernism, iconic-symbolic space of architecture, Neo-avant-garde architecture, metaphor in architecture, language of architecture

Abstract

The postulation of the new principles of being (decentration, plurality, chaoticness, rhizomaticity) by the philosophers -postmodernists reflected the nonlinear nature of the development of the social system, one of the projections of which was the formation of a new direction of architecture.
Analysis of the works of the theorists of postmodernism revealed the influence of the new worldview paradigm on the transformation of architecture as a response to social challenges of our time. The explication of the principles of postmodernism in architecture expressed itself in the transformation of its iconic-symbolic space, which is discussed in the article through semiotic analysis of a number of architectural objects.

How to Cite

Dumnova , E., Romannikov, O., & Gudkova, T. (2022). Explication of postmodern philosophy ideas in architecture. Project Baikal, 19(72), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.72.2000

Published

2022-06-24

Issue

No. 72 (2022): linearity

Section

refereed articles - post scriptum

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Bauman, Z. (2008). Liquid Modernity. (J. V. Asochakov, Trans). Saint-Petersburg.

Budanov, V. G. (2009). Synergetics methodology in post-non-classical science and education. Moscow: Izdatelstvo LKI.

Deleuze, G., & Gvattari, F. (1980). Rhizome. In Capitalisme et schizophrenie. Mille plateau. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.

Derrida, J. (2000). La structure, le signe et le jeu dans le discours des sciences humaines. In D. J. Kralechkin (Trans.), L’ecriture et la difference (pp. 352-368). Saint-Petersburg.

Dianova, V. M. (1999). Postmodern Philosophy of Art: Origins and Contemporaneity. Saint-Petersburg: Petropolis. Retrieved March 27, 2022, from http://anthropology.ru/ru/text/dianova-vm/postmodernistskaya-filosofiya-iskusstva-istoki-i-sovremennost#ss-1-postmodernistskaya-situaciya-v-zapadnoy-kulture-i-filosofskiy-postmodernizm.

Dobritsyna, I. A. (2004). From postmodernism to non-linear architecture: Architecture in the context of contemporary philosophy and science. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya.

Dobritsyna, I. A. (2005). Pluralism of modern architecture – a field of opportunities. Issues of Theory, 6. Retrieved from http://asm.rusk.ru/05/asm6/asm6_10.htm.

Dobritsyna, I. A. (2007). From postmodernism to non-linear architecture. Architecture in the context of modern philosophy and science: Abstract of dissertation. Retrieved April 16, 2022, from http://www.niitiag.ru/pub/pub_cat/dobritsyna_i_a_ot_postmodernizma_k_nelineynoy_arkhitekture.

Eco, U. (1986). Postmodernism, Irony, the Enjoyable. In Call things by their own names: keynote addresses by masters of Western European literature of the 20th century (pp. 224-229). Moscow: Progress.

Eco, U. (2004). Opera aperta. Forma e indeterninazione nelle poetiche contemporane (A. Shurbelev, Transl.). Saint-Petersburg.

Eco U. (1998). La struttura asssente. Introucione alla ricerca semiologica (A. G. Pogoniailo, & V. G. Reznik, Trans.). Saint-Petersburg: Petropolis.

Haddad, E. (2009) Charles Jencks and the historiography of Post-Modernism. The Journal of Architecture, 14:4, 493-510. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602360902867434

Fiedler, L. (1993). Cross the Border – Close the Gap. In Contemporary western cultural studies. Discourse suicide (pp. 462-518). Moscow.

Filippov, V., Kiselnikova, D., & Tereshina, S. (2016). Foreign Architecture of the 20th Century: Essays on the History of Modernism: A Study Guide. Novosibirsk: NGUADI.

Jencks, Ch. (1985). The Language of Post-Modern Architecture (A. V. Riabushkin, & M. V. Uvarova, Trans.; A. V. Ryabushin, & V. L. Khait, Eds.). Moscow: Stroiizdat.

Jencks, Ch. (1997). Post-modern Architecture and Time Fusion. In H. Bertens, & D. Fokkema (Eds.), International Postmodernism: Theory and literary practice. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.

Jencks, Ch. (2002). The New Paradigm in Architecture: The Language of Post-Modernism. New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 2002.

Konovalova, N. (2019). Architecture of Russian avant-garde and Japanese metabolism: Parallels of forms and meanings. Project Baikal, 16(62), 82-90. https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.62.1552

Shvetc, A. V. (2013). The theoretical ideas of architecture of the second half of the 20th century (based on a study of works of Charles Jencks). Akademicheskii vestnik UralNIIproekt RAASN, 3, 48-53. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/teoreticheskie-idei-arhitektury-vtoroy-poloviny-hh-veka-na-osnove-izucheniya-rabot-charlza-dzhenksa.

Stanishev, G, & Lidin, K. (2019). The Postmodern Condition. Project Baikal, 16(59):40-50. https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.59.1429

Touraine, A. (1998, November). Can we live together, equal and different? European Journal of Social Theory, 177.

Venturi, R. (1972). From “Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture”. In A. V. Ikonnikov, I. L. Mats, & G. M. Orlov (Eds.), Masters of architecture about architecture (pp. 543-558). Moscow. Retrieved from http://opentextnn.ru/man/venturi-r-iz-knigi-slozhnost-i-protivorechi-ja-v-arhitekture.