A theoretical model of the artistic and architectural object

Authors

  • Olga Volichenko Southwest State University
  • Jumamedel Imankulov Kyrgyz State Technical University named after I. Razzakov
  • Anastasia Marchenko Southwest State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51461/pb.75.22

Keywords:

architectural object, theoretical model, classical model, monostructural model, polystructural model, model of artistic work

Abstract

Research in architectural history is consistently based on three models of the architectural object: classical, monostructural and polystructural. In order to understand the methods and principles of modeling the architectural object, the authors consider the stages of methodological understanding of the model of the artistic object by outstanding philosophers and art historians, who addressed the problems of aesthetic worldview. It is noted that the contemporary architecture, gravitating toward artistic openness, semantic streamlining, polysemy and vagueness, can also be presented as the unity of the natural, artificial and conditional.

How to Cite

Volichenko, O., Imankulov, J., & Marchenko, A. (2023). A theoretical model of the artistic and architectural object. Project Baikal, 20(75), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.51461/pb.75.22

Published

2023-04-07

Issue

Section

refereed articles

References

Alberti, L. B. (1935-1937). Desyat knig o zodchestve [Ten books on architecture]. Moscow: Vses. Akad. Arhitektury.

Ballantyne, E. (2009). Arhitektura. Ochen kratkoe vvedenie [Architecture. A very short introduction]. Moscow: AST.

Basin, E. YA. (2015). Iskusstvo i kommunikaciya [Art and communication]. Saint Petersburg: Aletejya.

Deleuze, G. (1998). Razlichie i povtorenie [Difference and repetition] (N. B. Mankovskaya, & E. P. Yurovskaya, Trans.). Saint Petersburg: Petropolis.

Dobritsyna, I. A. (2004). Ot postmodernisma k nelinejnoj arhitekture: Arhitektura v kontekste sovremennoj filosofii i nauki [From Postmodernism to Nonlinear Architecture: Architecture in the Context of Modern Philosophy and Science]. Moscow: Progress-Tradiciya.

Fajzyev, V. R. (2018). Prostranstvo arhitektury, prostranstvo monumentalnogo iskusstva [The Space of Architecture, the Space of Monumental Art]. Vestnik Kirgizsko-Rossijskogo slavyanskogo universiteta, 18(8), 156-159.

Freilikh, S. I. (2009). Teoriya kino. From Ejzenshtejna to Tarkovskogo [Film Theory. From Eisenstein to Tarkovsky]. Moscow.

Gegel, G. W. F. (1968-1973). Estetika [Aesthetics] (B. G. Stolpner et al., Trans.). In 4 vols (Vol. 1). Moscow: Iskusstvo.

Johnson, P., & Wigley, M. (1988). Deconstructivist Architecture. N.Y.: Museum of Modern Art.

Kapustin, P. (2013, October 17). Kvaziestestvennoe [Quasi-natural]. Bashnya i labirint. Retrieved August 6, 2022, from https://papardes.blogspot.com/2013/10/blog-post_17.html

Nazarova, M. P. (2012). Sociokul’turnye smysly arhitekturnykh obiektov [Sociocultural meanings of architectural objects]. Vesti Volgogradskogo universiteta. Ser. 7, 1(16), 111-114.

Omuraliev, D. D., & Volichenko, O. V. (2009a). Obraz i formoobrazovanie v arhitekture [Image and form making in architecture]. Vestnik KGUSTA, Issue 1(23), Vol. 3, 198-203.

Omuraliev, D. D., & Volichenko, O. V. (2009b). Sopostavlenie teorii ponimaniya proizvedenij iskusstva i arhitektury [The Comparison of the Theory of Understanding of Art and Architecture]. Vestnik KGUSTA. Issue 1(23), Vol. 2, 114-120.

Omuraliev, D. D., & Volichenko, O. V. (2009c). Strukturnaya model arhitekturnogo obiekta [Structural model of an architectural object]. Vestnik KGUSTA, Issue 1(23), Vol. 3, 204-209.

Podoroga, V. A. (1995). Vyrazhenie i smysl [Expression and Meaning]. In The Landscape Worlds of Philosophy: Kierkegaard. Nietzsche. Heidegger. Proust. Kafka. Moscow: Ad Marginem.

Rappaport, A. G. (2002). K ponimaniyu arhitekturnoj formy [To understanding of architectural form]. Moscow: NIITIAG.

Revzin, G. I. (2002). Ocherki po filosofii arhitekturnoj formy [Essays on Philosophy of Architectural Form]. Moscow: OGI.

Tatarkevich, V. (1977). Antichnaya estetika [Antique aesthetics] (A. P. Ermilov, Trans.). Moscow: Iskusstvo.

Tsurganova, E. A. (2006). Amerikanskij dekonstruktivizm: za i protiv [American deconstructivism: pros and cons]. Chelovek: obraz, sushchnost. Gumanitarnye aspekty, 1, 170-186.