Antagonism of the concepts of “place” and “non-space” in architecture Authors Olga Volichenko Southwest State University Marina Zvyagintseva Southwest State University Downloads PDF (Русский) DOI: https://doi.org/10.51461/pb.74.18 Keywords: architectural space, the concept of “place”, the concept of “non-place”, sense of space, history Abstract The article deals with the theory, the main characteristics of the architectural space and the antagonism of the concepts of “place” and “non-place” on the example of Kursk architecture. The subject of the study is the contradictions in the development of modern cities that, on the one hand, erase their individual features and, on the other hand, demonstrate a significant tendency to appeal to the historical memory of the place. The article actualizes the problem of revealing cultural identity of the place focused on the formation of a sense of belonging to the past, preservation and reconstruction of historical objects, as well as creation of new architecture, which forms a symbiotic unity with the natural and historical context. How to Cite Volichenko, O., & Zvyagintseva, M. (2023). Antagonism of the concepts of “place” and “non-space” in architecture . Project Baikal, 19(74), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.51461/pb.74.18 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Published 2023-01-05 Issue No. 74 (2022): alternatives Section refereed articles License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. References Arkin, D. (Ed.) (1932). Arhitektura sovremennogo Zapada [Architecture of the Modern West]. M.: Izogiz. Arnhejm, R. (1984). Dinamika arhitekturnyh form [The dynamics of architectural forms]. M.: Strojizdat. Asmus, V. (1976). Antichnaya filosofiya [Antique Philosophy]. M.: Vysshaya shkola. Auge, M. (2017). Ne-mesta. Vvedenie v antropologiyu gipermoderna [Non-places. Introduction to an anthropology of hypermodernity] (A. Yu. Konnov, Trans.). M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. Filatova, A. V. (2011, May 19). Znacheniya i smysly ponyatiya “sociokoda” v sovremennoj social’no-filosofskoj mysli [Meanings of the concept of “sociocode” in the modern socio-philosophical thought]. Gumanitarnyj proekt Runivers. Retrieved August 3, 2022, from https://runivers.ru/philosophy/logosphere/103772/ Kostelanetz, R. (1970). Moholy-Nagy (Documentary monographs in modern art). New York: Prager.Object of the issue (2016). Project Baikal, 13(49), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.49 Skopina, M. V. (2012). Koncepciya “mesta” v sovremennoj landshaftnoj arhitekture Francii (na primere parkov La Villett i Andre Sitroen v Parizhe) [The concept of “place” in modern landscape architecture of France (by the example of La Villette and André Citroën parks in Paris) (05.23.20) [Ph.D. thesis, Nizhny Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering]. N.-Novgorod. Souriau, E. (2010). Vocabulaire d’esthétique. Paris: PUF. Spektor, D. M. (2017). K arhitekture prostranstva. Ocherk teorii. Chast’ I [To the Architecture of Space: Essays on Theory. Part I]. Urbanistika, 1, 61 - 82. DOI: 10.7256/2310-8673.2017.1.22504. Retrieved August 2, 2022, from https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=22504 Stepanov, A. V., Ivanova, G. I., & Nechaev, N. N. (2018). Arhitektura i psihologiya [Architecture and Psychology]. M.: Yurajt. Strel’nik, O. N. (2010). Osnovy filosofii [Fundamentals of philosophy]. M.: Yurajt. Zalesskij, V. V. (2008). Nuzhna li tochechnaya zastrojka? [Is the infill development necessary?] Russian Law Journal, 7(139), 49-58.