On transmutation of “the new in/with the existing”

Authors

  • Olga Zheleznyak INRTU

Downloads

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.67.1751

Keywords:

transmutation contact, succession, genetic code of culture, interaction of “the new with the existing

Abstract

A special genetic code of the city and culture becomes an important discourse of the modern city’s existence and an object of research and design. Inheritance is a constituent element of development processes. Interaction of the old and the new is one of the key features of interpretation of succession. A transmutation contact of “the new with the existing” and “the new in the existing” is a part of the processes of succession and the general development of culture, being one of the mechanisms that produce cultural patterns and genetic codes.

How to Cite

Zheleznyak, O. (2021). On transmutation of “the new in/with the existing”. Project Baikal, 18(67), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.67.1751

Published

2021-04-27

Issue

No. 67 (2021): genetics of the city

Section

refereed articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Azizyan, I. A., Dobritsyna, I. A., & Lebedeva, G. S. (2002). Teoriya kompozitsii kak poetika arkhitektury [The theory of composition

as poetics of architecture]. Moscow: Progress­traditsiya.

Baller, E. A. (1969). Preemstvennost v razvitii kultury [Succession in the development of culture]. Moscow: Nauka.

Epstein, M. (2004). Znak probela: O budushchem gumanitarnykh nauk [Blank space: On the future of humanities]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.

Gerasimenko, A. (2009, May 29). Geneticheskiy kod goroda [A genetic code of the city]. https://archi.ru/russia/16920/geneticheskii­kod­goroda­master­klass­sergeya­chobana­na­arh­moskve

Herder, J.­G. (1977). Idei k filosofii istorii chelovechestva [Ideas on the philosophy of the history of mankind]. Moscow: Nauka.

Lavrenova, T. I. (2009). Teoreticheskie osnovy izucheniya preemstvennosti v kulture [Theoretical background for studying the succession in culture]. Izvestiya PGPU im. V. G. Belinskogo,

(15), 19­24.

Lotman, Yu. M. (1992). Neskolko myslei o tipologii kultur

[A few thoughts on the typology of cultures]. In Statyi po semiotike i tipologii kultury (Vol. I, pp. 102­109). Tallin.

Megill, A. (2007). Istoricheskaya epistemologiya [Historical epistemology]. Moscow: Kanon+, ROOI Reabilitatsiya.

Nora, P. (1999). Problematika mest pamyati [Problematics of the places of memory]. In Frantsiya­pamyat (pp.17­50). Saint Petersburg:

Izd­vo S.­Peterb. Un­ta.

Petrov, M. K. (1991). Yazyk. Znak. Kultura [Language. Sign. Culture]. Moscow: Nauka.

Sadyeva, N. S.­D. (2010). Rol ponyatiy “nepreryvnost” i “nerazryvnost”

v ponimanii sushchnosti traditsiy [The role of the notions “permanence” and “continuity” in the insight into traditions]. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 6, 54­59.

Slavinsky, S. P. (2018). “Kod goroda” i ego otrazhenie na primere gradostroitelnogo razvitiya Velikogo Novgoroda [The “code of the city” and its reflection through the example of the urban development of Veliky Novgorod]. PRΑΞNΜΑ. Problemy vizualnoi semiotiki, 3, 128­144.

Zheleznyak, O. E. (2004). Identifikatsionnye prostranstva goroda. Transmutatsiya [Identification spaces of the city. Transmutation].

In Gorod: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov (pp. 139­146). Irkutsk.

Zheleznyak, O. E., & Okhrimenko, G. I. (2009). Prostranstva kulturnoi identifikatsii. Semeiskie Zabaikalya [Spaces of cultural identification. Semeyskie of the Trans­Baikal Region]. Irkutsk: IrGTU.