Downloads
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.47-48.1005Keywords:
power representation, absolute monarchy, palace as an artwork, democracy, museefication of palacesAbstract
Today the notion of palace is rather vague. It unites artistically and functionally heterogeneous buildings. Historically, there are two types of palaces: a palace-delubrum (Ancient times, Middle Ages) and a palace-artwork (epochs of absolute monarchies). From the middle of the 19th century different public buildings that had no relation to power representation were called palaces: the Chrystal Palace, the Palace of Nations, etc. In the USSR there were Palaces of Culture, Palaces of Soviets, Palaces of Labour, etc. Such public buildings can be called palaces-simulacrums, which are to cultivate democratic illusions in the society. The museeficated old-time palaces are a dead ‘outer body’ of the deceased rulers. Palaces remain alive only when they are abodes of the Power.
How to Cite
Published
Issue
Section
References
Nikiforova, L. (n. d.). Dvorets v istorii russkoi kultury. Opyt tipologii [A palace in the history of Russian culture. Typology experience]. Retrieved from http://profilib.com/kniga/139995/larisa-nikiforova-dvorets-v-istorii-russkoy-kultury-opyt-tipologii.php
Rappaport, A. (2015, May 31). Gatchina i pamyat [Gatchina and memory]. Retrieved from https://papardes.blogspot.ru